Sunday, February 28, 2010

A Dan good cookie

We all know it takes a real man to make a good cookie. So when Dan says, "I'm going to make Snickerdoodles", there's no getting in his way. Next thing you know, the mixer is out and the game face is on. COOKIE TIME, MOTHERF****** (no bad words - my grandma just discovered my blog).

Things you need:
1 cup butter
1 1/2 cup sugar
2 eggs
2 tsp vanilla
2 3/4 cups flour
2 tsp cream tartar (Dan annoyingly insists on this, though I have no clue what it is)
1 tsp baking soda
1/4 tsp salt
For the extra special cinnamon-sugaryness (essential):
2 tbs sugar
2 tsp cinnamon

To do:
Preheat oven to 400°
Cream butter, sugar, eggs, vanilla together
Mix in flour, baking soda, salt
Spread the extra cinnamon and sugar on a piece of wax paper
To make each cookie, pick out a pieces of dough from the batter, roll them by hand

Roll the little batter balls (hehe) in the cinnamon-sugar mixture
Place on the cookie sheet as is (do not flatten)
Bake the cookies for 8 minutes 30 seconds (yes, 8 minutes and 30 seconds).

Before placing the cookies on a cooling rack, allow them to sit for about 2 minutes.





CINNAMON SUGAR HAPPINESS.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Inktastic!

For my next tattoo, I'm planning to get my middle name on my right outer ankle. I found this great font online by a Brazilian graphic desinger, Doulgas Vitkauskas (http://www.vtks.com.br/).

What I love is the clash of the regal upper-case "G" (fleur de lis and all) with the plain and awkward lower-case letters.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

New Yorker brings the Ramapough Indian situation to light. Hopefully.

My jaw dropped this week on the train as I was flipping through the March 1 issue of The New Yorker. I came upon a lengthy feature by local correspondent Ben McGrath, which discusses the Ramapough Mountain Indians, an infamous and socially isolated group that resides in my old town (where my parents still live), Ringwood, and also in the woods of Mahwah, NJ.

"Strangers on the Mountain" begins with a brief look at illegal riding of A.T.V.s in the mountains (Stag Hill) of Mahwah, and transitions into the story of Emil Mann, a resident of the area who was shot and killed by a New Jersey forest ranger back in 2006 apparently out of self-defense.

McGrath explores the history and questionable origins of the people, known as the Ramapough Mountain Indians, or the Ramapo Lenape Nation. He writes, "The Ramapoughs number a few thousand, marry largely among themselves, and are concentrated in three primary settlements: on and around Stag Hill, in Mahwah; in the village of Hillburn, New York... in Ringwood, New Jersey, in the remains of an old, iron-mining complex." He tries to simplify their genetic make-up: Lenape and Tuscarora Native Americans, Afro-Dutch slaves, and possibly Italian and Irish immigrants in the early 20th-century.

McGrath gets the point across rather quickly that this is a marginalized group, often subject to avid racisim of the mostly white, middle-class surrounding communities. For example, where I grew up (nearby Oakland, NJ), they were known as "mountain people", or the "Jackson Whites" - a term which carries heavy racist sentiments.

I first heard about them from my father. I was very young (maybe 10?) and my brother and I were hiking with him in some type of woods. We were on a road, and he told us we had to turn around, because he was afraid to run into the "Jackson Whites". We asked him what he was talking about. I remember he said he had a mountain biker friend who went to far up this road, and he saw a man with a shotgun who told him to get off his property. Something like that. I think he also said it was a black man, with blue eyes. For some reason I picture overalls. (Of course, we all probably picture overalls).


When my family moved to Ringwood several years ago, the hostility became more evident. I attended high school with students with names like Van Dunk, Mann, De Groat. I always thought they were African American from their complexions, but some kids referred to them as "mineys", which I never really got. They usually kept to themselves, were not the best students, and got into trouble a lot with administration. Many of them were cousins. You could tell they didn't have a lot of money. The other problem was the concentration of white students who somewhat considered themselves "rednecks" (not kidding), so there was a generally understood (and even accepted) racism amongst them.

A couple of years ago, the Bergen Record printed an investigative series on the Ford superfund site in upper-Ringwood, and it's toxic impact on the Ramapough Indians. This was, at least for me, the first time I ever saw an attempt at full understanding of the people, their impoverished lifestyle, their situation. McGrath brings this to light in the article: tons of paint sludge from a Ford plant in the 1960's was dumped in the vicinity of the Ramapoughs, and has since then plagued the area with various types of cancers and serious illnesses (very much ala Erin Brockovich). Their legal struggle with Ford, the E.P.A., and the cleanup of the site still continues today, but is slow, sometimes forgotten, virtually put on the back-burner.

The situation is unfortunate, and in my opinion, undoubtedly the product of social marginalization. McGrath presents the facts and history as they stand. After reading the article, you can see there is no doubt local racism is the culprit for these people's plight.

Interestingly, though not suprisingly, McGrath's article contained no images of the upper-Ringwood area and its people who he describes so vividly. Even in our local newspapers, the photos seem abstract, distant, and non-descript. This mirrors the mysetry and thus isolation of these people, who are very much real and, I believe, should be more accessible, instead of being considered an element of "Weird New Jersey".

Here's a few links for further reading:
A blurb about the article on The New Yorker website (this just happens to be one that you need a subscription to see, so maybe go buy a copy?):
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/01/100301fa_fact_mcgrath
"Toxic Legacy", the 5-part series on the Ringwood superfund site by the Bergen Record:
http://www.northjersey.com/specialreports/toxiclegacy.html
The trusy Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramapough_Mountain_Indians
The Ramapough Lenape Nation website: http://www.ramapoughlenapenation.org/

Monday, February 22, 2010

Bizniz trip

I spent a few days in Chicago last week for a regional American Philosophical Association meeting. I spent most of the time at the book exhibit chatting with the few friendly old dudes and dudettes (ahem; philosophers) who decided to attend, but when I was off-duty, I tried to explore as much as possible.

This was my first time in Ferris Bueller-Land, and I have to say that I loved it. The city is big, wide and inviting. It's surprisingly quiet and good-smelling (sorry, NYC). The people are very nice - and good at giving lost tourists directions (another NYC shortcoming). Restaurants offer good seafood and sushi. Only problem: their sales tax is outrageous (10.25%), which was tough with an Urban Outfitters and H&M right down the street! I spent every penny with good intentions (most of it company money - no, not on clothes). Here are the few pictures I took while galavanting:


Sweet lion statue in front of the Art Institute of Chicago (http://www.artic.edu/aic/). I went to the museum on my last day, and I have to say I wasn't very impressed. It was filled to the brim with visitors (it being "Free February" and all), and the exhibits were noticeably smaller than, you know, the Met. I did LOVE their photography exhibit, though it was right next to the children's museum, and therefore noisy and germy.


I stayed at The Palmer House on Monroe street, which is very close to Millennium Park (http://www.millenniumpark.org/): a gorgeous wide open park that's very near Lake Michigan, which I saw from a safe distance. I visited it early in the morning before I had to be at our exhibit booth.

The city was most beautiful at night. I felt pretty safe walking around alone at the touristy spots, which I don't even like to do in NY. I eventually ran into the Chicago river (or at least it might have been the Chicago river).








I forgot all about my most favorite musical ever until I saw this marquis for the Chicago Theater.

All. That. Jazz.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Sweet Home, Chicago



Here until Saturday with some lovely and mildly content Philosophers! Will write soon.

xoxo

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Antibiotici e Fellini

Ciao tutti,

Yesterday I went to the doctor and found out that the headaches I've been having for the past few weeks were sinus headaches, and now I essentially have a sinus infection. Needless to say, I got a few tubes of some strong medicine, changed into my jammies, and cozied up with tea and Netflix for the rest of Saturday.

8 1/2 (1963) is one of those Italian movies I've always wanted to watch, but was terrified to attempt without ever having been a film history student. Then when Nine (2009) came out a few months ago, I figured I should watch the original before the (psuedo-)remake. I wasn't expecting to understand it, or comment on it in any way, and I was going to kind of pretend I'd never seen it in case someone might approach me to discuss "il genio di Fellini"... or something.

But I have to say, I think I got it. I really did. I'm not going to articulate (surprise!), but if you go into this film with the notion of: I'm pretty sure this is out of my league, what the hell am I doing? You'll actuallybe pretty relieved at the accessibility and relatibility of the recurring themes and main characters (all of whom you're supposed to adore - at least I did).

I'll show you a clip of one of my favorite scenes. Guido, the main character, is being visited by his wife, Luisa, and her friend, Rossella, at the spa/resort, where he is residing for a time, to relax. Carla, Guido's mistress, shows up unexpectedly, and is seen and observed by all three. Luisa knows what's up, and starts hissing at her husband. Up until this scene, she's been reserved and silently accepting of Guido's unfaithful behavior, which kind of pissed me off. But now she really lets him have it, and you don't have to understand Italian to know what's going on.

The thing is... I really like Carla (sigh).

The scene progresses into a hillarious fanatsy where Guido lives happily with all the women of his life, in one house. Wife and mistresses embrace each other as friends and family. IT'S SO FUNNY! (Feminist friends: the key to not be offended by this sequence is to remember that Guido is the weak and inadequate male character that brings these strong and capable women together in "unreality"). Enjoy.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

snowed-in feast

North Jersey was hit pretty hard yesterday with an awesome blizzard that granted us the day off. Since I had to keep occupied in our itty bitty one-bedroom (o, cabin fever!). I Googled two yummy things we had in the kitchen: chicken and lentils, and I found that there's a popular Moroccan dish that combines the two along with some kick-ass spices that we just happened to gave in our itty bitty spice pantry. I put my own twist on the recipe by mixing the lentils with some leftover brown rice and baby spinach (which I put on/in everything. It's pretty.).

Moroccan-style chicken with lentils and brown rice

For the chicken:
1 package of chicken breast tenderloins, rinsed and cleaned
1/2 large white onion, diced
olive oil
1 teaspoon salt
1/3 tablespoon cumin
1 tablespoon chili powder
1/4 teaspoon ground cinnamon

For the lentils and brown rice mixture:
1 cup brown or red lentils
1 cup water
1 cup chicken broth
2 cups cooked, leftover brown rice
1/2 bag baby spinach
olive oil

For the dressing:
1/2 cup olive oil
1/2 cup red wine vinegar
2 tablespoons chili powder
1 tablespoon cumin
1 garlic clove, minced
1/4 teaspoon ground cinnamon
salt
pepper

Directions!

To make the dressing, put all ingredients in a small mixing bowl, and wisk them all together.

Put the lentils in a small saucepan with the water and chicken broth. Bring to a boil, then simmer for about 15 minutes.

Use a frying pan for the chicken: heat up some olive oil and add onions
Cook the onions until brown and soft
Add a little more olive oil, then the chicken - let it cook for about two minutes
Add salt, cumin, chili powder, cinnamon - let cook for another 10-15 minutes on medium heat until it's cooked through.
Add a little of the dressing you just made, and mix it into the chicken.


When the lentils are almost ready, take out your trusty wok (or large saucepan), turn on the heat and add some olive oil
Add the rice, mix it up a bit, and let cook for about 3-5 minutes
Once the lentils are ready, pour them on top of the rice and mix them together.
Add some more of the dressing, but keep a little for later!
Add baby spinach, a little at a time, and mix in more as it cooks down.
Let cook all together for another 3-5 minutes.



PERFETTO!



Wednesday, February 10, 2010

All hail Eggers!

I mean it now: Dave Eggers is infallible. He is part God. I love his books.

I remember meeting some guy at a creative writing conference at William Patterson University last year, and we chatted about our unconditional love of Eggers, and he said, “Dude, have you read You Shall Know Our Velocity!?” So I have been meaning to pick it up for a while now, but I needed to first finish What is the What (2007) and then his latest, Zeitoun (2009). I also saw (and wept childishly at) Where the Wild Things Are (2009), although I still haven’t read the book (it’s expensive!). So, I’ve not neglected my Eggers these past few years.

You Shall Know Our Velocity! (Vintage, 2003) starts with an appropriately Egger-ish announcement on the first page:
“EVERYTHING WITHIN TAKES PLACE AFTER JACK DIED AND BEFORE MY MOM AND I DROWNED IN A BURNING FERRY IN THE COOL TANNIN-TINTED GUAVIARE RIVER, IN EAST-CENTRAL COLOMBIA, WITH FORTY-TWO LOCALS WE HADN’T YET MET. IT WAS A CLEAR AND EYEBLUE DAY, THAT DAY, AS WAS THE FIRST DAY OF THIS STORY, A FEW YEARS AGO IN JANUARY, ON CHICAGO’S NORTH SIDE, IN THE OPULENT SHADOW OF WRIGLEY AND WITH THE WIND COMING LOW AND SEARCHING OFF THE JAGGED HALF-FROZEN LAKE. I WAS INSIDE, VERY WARM, WALKING FROM DOOR TO DOOR.”

Will and Hand are best friends from Milwaukee and have $32,000 that they must give away to those “most deserving” around the world in seven days. Emotionally unstable and disorganized, the two plan trips to several countries that they believe to be impoverished. Jack, their third and closest friend, has recently died in a car crash. Hand and Will are still mourning his death, and can’t shake memories of their childhood together, as well as the brutality of the accident. In addition to all this, Will has been recently beat-up by some people (not sure), and his face and body are visibly bruised.

The pair travel to Dakar, where they dance in trippy nightclubs, speak bad French, and are in constant fear of being kidnapped and murdered by the Senegalese. They try to tape money to donkeys for the locals to find.

They travel to Morocco, where people spit on them (thinking them French), and they practice jumping from their rental car window into merchants’ street carts.

They travel to Estonia, where they bury money in the ground and make a treasure map for a child to find it. They spend one night jumping around on tree limbs twenty feet off the ground.

They wanted to end up in Cairo and watch the sunrise from the top of a pyramid, but didn’t have time.

In many ways, Will and Hand are still boys (popular archetypes of Eggers’) who carry a chivalrous, romanticized idea of life and achievement. But they have no clue what they’re doing (at least most of the time). They take on a task wholly larger than themselves, and are completely unaware of it. But Eggers turns their unadulterated determination into beauty in this complex, but moving, narrative.

This book is about too many things: a once-in-a-lifetime trip, memory and pain, letting life come and go, and how the F-word makes dialogue hilarious. READ IT, because my review doesn't do it justice for shit.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Lazy Sunday Review: Funny People (2009)

Well, I guess Superbowl Sunday doesn’t exactly define a “Lazy Sunday”, but for us miscreants, the only thing of interest is The Who at halftime. Doesn’t Roger Daltrey EVER get sick of PINBALL WIZARD?



Last night, Dan and I watched Funny People, the new Judd Apatow film that just came to DVD. Now: there are many, many things one could say about why this movie sucked. I just want to know why I didn’t hear any of them before I ordered it on Netflix. The few reviews I read were overwhelmingly praiseworthy. The only warning I had was Dan (he had a hunch it would be lame).

Adam Sandler stars as George Simmons, a wealthy comedian who lives alone in a giant mansion in LA (I’m guessing Sandler’s playing a version of himself?). Within the first few minutes of the movie, George is diagnosed with a form of Leukemia, and will most likely not survive. Seth Rogen, co-starring as Ira Wright, enters the film as an aspiring stand-up comic, and is star-struck when a bitter and desperate George discovers him at a comedy club and hires him as his personal assistant. What follows (more or less) is George’s journey from self-loathing and regret to vindication and possibly happiness.

I have to admit that the first hour or so of the film was rather moving: the introduction of the threatening disease, followed by a view into the George’s loneliness and desperation, followed by his outreach to anyone (Ira) who would be close to him, in his mansion, during his final days. Finally, in his own way, George comes to terms with the end of his life. I will never forget one scene in which Ira finds George in bed, sleep-deprived and weepy, because he couldn’t get his television to work. He stands up, weak, robed in blue terrycloth, and starts screaming out of anger and fear of his debilitation. I gasped (silently)… Sandler is kind of like Pacino right now. I can’t believe it. He’s doing Pacino from Angels in America (2003) (go see this definitely, by the way). That’s how good it got.

This is all in the first 90 minutes, mind you (translation: THIS MOVIE SHOULD BE OVER SOON, RIGHT?).

If you’ve ever seen any of Apatow’s movies, you know he’s not in a rush to end the story candidly, or even appropriately. Nope, here’s where the crap comes full speed ahead, for another freakin’ hour. Leslie Mann (will Apatow EVER cast anyone besides his wife?) co-stars as the love of George’s life / the one who got away. SNORE. She hated him, but now they start talking because he’s sick, and they still love each other, but she’s married, with kids (it’s always fun to watch the Apatow girls as they grow up), but she might leave her husband for George, but actually not, BLAH BLAH BLAH. My God, why!?

I feel that it was the sudden transition from a “moving film” to “a waste of time” that ruined the entire thing. Jonah Hill was in it too, by the by, and he was pretty funny.

The ending sucked. Go rent Angels in America instead.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Paparazzi pups

Whoever thought of melding Lady Gaga with Westminster Kennel Club ads is a GENIUS. Beats the crap out of those weepy Sarah McLachlan commercials.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Secret love: SAUSAGE

That wasn't a dirty joke - it's the truth. And although I'm an aspiring vegetarian, we have a lot of sausage stored up in our freezer that we do have to use up eventually (thanks to Mr. Daniel, non-chef).

I took a mental health day this week, and I spent most of my free time thinking about dinner. (Fine, I usually spend most of my time thinking about dinner. At home or at work.) We had a can of beans and sausage to use up, so I thought about doing some type of sausage and bean stew. Here's what happened:



Faux Italian sausage and bean stew:
olive oil
salt
pepper
basil
1/2 white onion, diced
3 cloves of garlic, chopped (LOVE)
1/2 large can of crushed tomatoes
1 can Canellini beans, rinsed (I like Progresso's)
4-5 spicy Italian sausages (or you can try sweet, too), cut into 1-2 inch pieces
1/2 bag of baby spinach

Directions:

Use a large, flat saucepan, or a wok (I use a wok for everything)
Heat up the saucepan and add olive oil
Once hot, add the onions and garlic, and let them simmer for 3-4 minutes
Add the sausage pieces and cook until browned (but don't overcook!)
Add the beans, stir, and let them sit with the sausage for about 5 minutes
Add the crushed tomatoes, stir until everything is covered, and let this stew for about 10-15 minutes on a lower heat. Cover it if you have a lid.
Add the spinach a little at a time, mixing it in and adding more as it cooks down. After you've added it all, let it cook for another 5 minutes.
Add seasonings as desired, remove from heat and serve. MANGIATE!

WARNING: this is really good as leftovers - actually better.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Welcome (gotcha!)

Hello (real) friends,

Thank you graciously for joining me for my first stab at blogging. Since I haven't exactly drilled down a topic or theme yet (see: subtitle), you're sure to be privy to a dirty hodge-podge of stories, rants, and swooning. Tons of swooning.

I'll likely start off with musings in the women's interest category (we write what we know! When I don't, I tend to offend people), but I'll also share thoughts and snippets about books, movies, concerts, and relevant magazine/newspaper articles. I will, inevitably, write about things North-Jerseyan, but probably more so about NYC, where I spend most of my life slaving (barely) for the textbook publishing industry.

I LOVE FOOD, COOKING, AND RESTAURANTS - AND I WILL WRITE ABOUT THEM. And I promise to include pictures and recipes!

Now: you might know that I cancelled my Facebook recently, all to start the blog. Strange/silly/non-conformist, eh? Well, I tend to do strange things, and I thought spending too much time on Facebook was downright silly. Plus I felt like being non-conformist (albeit in a rather trivial way). I haven't written a thing in almost a year (can you tell?), and hell yes, I'm going to partially blame it on my attention to Facebook. Although I probably didn't qualify as an addict, I felt that I put too much life into it - posting too many unhealthy, misspelled exclamations on friends' walls, learning all-too personal details that I could never "un-know" (credit: Louis C.K.), and stalking people who I'm naturally not supposed to have (don't feel like having) contact with any longer. Plus, my dad is on it. Not the last straw, per se, but from the beginning a fundamental no-no.

So, after five years (FIVE FUCKING YEARS!) I'm just letting it go, in hopes that this change will remedy my writer's block, which at this point has evolved from an annoying blockage to a life-threatening clot.

Peace-out loves.